Peer review process
The Revista Científica de Historia - C.H.E (Construcciones Históricas por Estudiantes) considers for publication unpublished and original articles, which will be submitted to evaluation.
The manuscripts with abstracts - articles and dossiers- will be evaluated according to the criteria and methodology of the international anonymous arbitration process (double-blind). The arbitration process involves the evaluation of two judges from different institutions and universities; the identity of the author and the reviewers will be kept confidential during the evaluation process. The evaluators will be selected according to their scientific level and thematic affinity with the manuscript to be evaluated. Evaluations will be carried out exclusively according to criteria of scientific relevance, originality, clarity and relevance of the papers presented.
The possible results of the evaluations can be three: accepted - accepted with changes - rejected. If a paper is rejected by a single evaluator, a third arbitrator will be called upon. The author will be notified of the results within 2 months of submitting the contribution.
The Revista Científica de Historia - C.H.E (Construcciones Históricas por Estudiantes) reserves the right not to send for evaluation those works that do not comply with the indications indicated in the "Editorial Guidelines", also reserves the right to make modifications to the original text accepted.
La revista se reserva el derecho de incluir los artículos aceptados para publicación en el número que considere más conveniente.
The authors are responsible for the content and the views expressed, which do not necessarily coincide with those of the journal.